| Peer-Reviewed

Common Defects of Buildings in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria

Received: 14 March 2023     Accepted: 4 April 2023     Published: 5 August 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Building maintenance problems are a breakdown in a building's performance, function, and user requirements. Moreover, these problems can be in its structure, services, and other facilities. These problems primarily manifest as defects and should be rectified immediately; otherwise, they would result in a higher maintenance cost, hinder operational efficiency, and even reduce lifespan. At the same time, poor building performance and inadequacies due to these maintenance defects have been known to cause unproductivity of building users and even illnesses. Therefore, it is pertinent to investigate these defects to create maintenance solutions for them. However, even though studies abound on university building maintenance in Nigeria, its issues, and the factors affecting it, there is still the need to explore the common maintenance defects affecting buildings in public universities. Few studies have been conducted on common building maintenance defects; however, these defects have been well-researched in this study. Therefore, this paper illustrates the findings from assessing the common defects in six selected higher education institutions in the country. This study embraced a quantitative approach, and data were gathered from maintenance managers, supervisors, and technicians working in the Works Departments of the selected public institutions. Data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics such as percentile and factor analysis. Findings revealed that the most common defects affecting university buildings are joinery infestation and fittings, substandard finishes and cracks, deterioration and leakages, and rusting and installation issues.

Published in American Journal of Construction and Building Materials (Volume 7, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajcbm.20230701.12
Page(s) 7-12
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Maintenance, Building Maintenance, Maintenance Defects, Higher Education Institutions

References
[1] Abdul Lateef, O. (2009). Building maintenance management in Malaysia. Journal of Building. Appraisal, 4 (3), pp. 207-214.
[2] Abdul Lateef, O., Khamidi, F. M. and Idrus, A. (2010). Building maintenance management in a Malaysian university campus: a case study. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, The, 10 (1/2), pp. 101-114.
[3] Abd-Wahab, S., Sairi, A., A. I. Che-Ani, N. M. Tawil, and S. Johar (2015). Building maintenance issues: A Malaysian scenario for high-rise residential buildings, Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res.
[4] Abisuga, A. O., Famakin, I. O. and Oshodi, O. S. (2016). Educational building conditions and the health of users. Construction Economics and Building, 16 (4), pp. 19–34.
[5] Akinsola, E. O., Hussaini, O. P., Oyenuga, O. S. and Fatokun, A. O., (2012). Critical factors influencing facility maintenance management of tertiary institutional buildings in Southwest Nigeria. Mediterranean journal of social sciences, 3 (11), pp. 489-489.
[6] Alves T. M. G. and Casado L. J. A. (2019). Building maintenance management activities in a public institution. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26 (1), pp. 85–103.
[7] Arbo, P. and P. Benneworth (2007). Understanding the Regional Contribution of Higher Education Institutions: A Literature Review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 9, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/161208155312.
[8] Babatope, B. A. (2011). Problems of facilities in south west Nigerian universities and the way forward. Journal of Education Administration and Policy Studies, 2 (2), pp. 39–43.
[9] Bagdiya, N. and Wadalkar, S. (2015). Defects and post-construction defects effect in residential building. International Journal Of Engineering Research & Technology (Ijert) Volume, 4.
[10] Bhargava Reddy, P., Ratnamala Reddy, B. S. S., and S. S. Asadi (2018). Evaluation of maintenance management in construction to reduce the maintenance cost. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 367–374.
[11] Chew, L. M. Y. (2005). Defect analysis in wet areas of buildings. Construction and Building Materials, 19 (3), pp. 165–173.
[12] Choka, D. G. (2012). A study on the impact of maintenance management systems on maintenance condition of built facilities (case study of public universities in Kenya). Department of Real Estate & Construction Management, University of Nairobi.
[13] Dahal, R. C., and Dahal, K. C., (2020). A Review on Problems of the Public Building Maintenance Works with Special Reference to Nepal. Am. J. Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 39–50, doi: 10.11648/j.ajcbm.20200402.12.
[14] Forcada, N. and Bortolini, R. (2018). Building inspection system for evaluating the technical performance of existing buildings. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 32 (5), p. 04018073.
[15] Forcada, N., Macarulla, M., Gangolells, M. and Casals, M. (2016). Handover defects: comparison of construction and post-handover housing defects. Building Research & Information, 44 (3), pp. 279-288.
[16] Hanafi, H. M, M. U. Umar, A. A. Razak, Z. Z. A. Rashid, N. Z. Noriman, and O. S. Dahham. (2018). Common Defect of Colonial Buildings in Malaysia, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, vol. 454, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/454/1/012186.
[17] Hovde, P. J. and Moser, K. (2004). Performance-based methods for service life prediction. State of the art reports, CIB Report: Publication, 294.
[18] Kamal, K., AbWahab, L. and Ahmad, A., (2012). Pilot survey on the conservation of historical buildings in Malaysia. (41193), pp. 104–115.
[19] Lavy, S. and Bilbo, D. L. (2009). Facilities maintenance management practices in large public schools, Texas. Facilities, 27 (1–2), pp. 5–20.
[20] Leung, M. Y. and Fung, I. (2005). Enhancement of classroom facilities of primary schools and its impact on learning behaviours of students. Facilities. doi: 10.1108/02632770510627561.
[21] Macarulla, M., Forcada, N., and P. E. D. Love, (2013). Assessment of Residential Defects at Post-Handover,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 372–378, doi: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000603.
[22] Mohd Isa, H. (2011). Learning from Defects in Design and Build Hospital Projects in Malaysia, vol. 5, pp. 238–242.
[23] Ochieng, R., Wanyona, G. and Diang’a, O. S. (2013). Post occupancy defects in public office buildings in Nairobi city the causes and ratings.
[24] Ofide, B., Jimoh, R. and Achuenu, E. (2015). Assessment of building maintenance management practices of higher education institutions in Niger state – Nigeria. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 15 (2), pp. 1–14.
[25] Olagunju, R. E. (2012). Predictive modelling for sustainable residential building maintenance in developing countries: a nigeria case. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research In Business, 4 (6), pp. 1273–1283.
[26] Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival manual. A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 4.
[27] Pérez-Bella, M. J. Domínguez-Hernández, B. Rodríguez-Soria, J. J. Del Coz-Díaz, and E. Cano-Suñén (2013). A new method for determining the water tightness of building facades. Build. Res. Inf., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 401–414, doi: 10.1080/09613218.2013.774936.
[28] Pheng, L. S., and Wee, D., (2001). Improving maintenance and reducing building defects through ISO 9000," J. Qual. Maint. Eng., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 6–24, doi: 10.1108/13552510110386865.
[29] Smyth, R and Johnson, A. (2016) "Factor Analysis," July, pp. 189–205.
[30] Spector, P. (2015). Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction. Aging, 7 (11), pp. 956–963.
[31] Stern, L. (2010). A visual approach to SPSS for Windows: a guide to SPSS 17.0. wps.ablongman.com, pp. xii, 420 p.
[32] Tan, Y., Shen, L., Langston, C., Lu, W. and CH Yam, M. (2014). Critical success factors for building maintenance business: a Hong Kong case study. Facilities, 32 (5/6), pp. 208-225.
[33] Tanner, C. K. (2000). The influence of school architecture on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 309-330.
[34] Wahab, A. A. S. and Hamid, M. Y. (2011). A review factors affecting building defects of structural steel construction. Case study: Student accommodation in UiTM Perak. Procedia Engineering. Elsevier, pp. 174–179.
[35] Wing, C. K., Raftery, J. and Walker, A. (1998). The baby and the bathwater: Research methods in construction management. Construction Management and Economics, 16 (1), pp. 99–104.
[36] Zakariyyah, I. K., Soyingbe, A. A., and Adenekan, J. A. (2020). Dampness patterns in halls of residence in Lagos metropolis: a case study of the university of Lagos. LAUTECH Journal of Civil and Environmental Studies, pp. 344–363.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ayokunle Lesanmi, Clinton Aigbavboa, Ngcobo Ntebo, Douglas Aghimien. (2023). Common Defects of Buildings in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria. American Journal of Construction and Building Materials, 7(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcbm.20230701.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ayokunle Lesanmi; Clinton Aigbavboa; Ngcobo Ntebo; Douglas Aghimien. Common Defects of Buildings in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria. Am. J. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 7(1), 7-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcbm.20230701.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ayokunle Lesanmi, Clinton Aigbavboa, Ngcobo Ntebo, Douglas Aghimien. Common Defects of Buildings in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria. Am J Constr Build Mater. 2023;7(1):7-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcbm.20230701.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajcbm.20230701.12,
      author = {Ayokunle Lesanmi and Clinton Aigbavboa and Ngcobo Ntebo and Douglas Aghimien},
      title = {Common Defects of Buildings in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria},
      journal = {American Journal of Construction and Building Materials},
      volume = {7},
      number = {1},
      pages = {7-12},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajcbm.20230701.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcbm.20230701.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajcbm.20230701.12},
      abstract = {Building maintenance problems are a breakdown in a building's performance, function, and user requirements. Moreover, these problems can be in its structure, services, and other facilities. These problems primarily manifest as defects and should be rectified immediately; otherwise, they would result in a higher maintenance cost, hinder operational efficiency, and even reduce lifespan. At the same time, poor building performance and inadequacies due to these maintenance defects have been known to cause unproductivity of building users and even illnesses. Therefore, it is pertinent to investigate these defects to create maintenance solutions for them. However, even though studies abound on university building maintenance in Nigeria, its issues, and the factors affecting it, there is still the need to explore the common maintenance defects affecting buildings in public universities. Few studies have been conducted on common building maintenance defects; however, these defects have been well-researched in this study. Therefore, this paper illustrates the findings from assessing the common defects in six selected higher education institutions in the country. This study embraced a quantitative approach, and data were gathered from maintenance managers, supervisors, and technicians working in the Works Departments of the selected public institutions. Data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics such as percentile and factor analysis. Findings revealed that the most common defects affecting university buildings are joinery infestation and fittings, substandard finishes and cracks, deterioration and leakages, and rusting and installation issues.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Common Defects of Buildings in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria
    AU  - Ayokunle Lesanmi
    AU  - Clinton Aigbavboa
    AU  - Ngcobo Ntebo
    AU  - Douglas Aghimien
    Y1  - 2023/08/05
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcbm.20230701.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajcbm.20230701.12
    T2  - American Journal of Construction and Building Materials
    JF  - American Journal of Construction and Building Materials
    JO  - American Journal of Construction and Building Materials
    SP  - 7
    EP  - 12
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-0057
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcbm.20230701.12
    AB  - Building maintenance problems are a breakdown in a building's performance, function, and user requirements. Moreover, these problems can be in its structure, services, and other facilities. These problems primarily manifest as defects and should be rectified immediately; otherwise, they would result in a higher maintenance cost, hinder operational efficiency, and even reduce lifespan. At the same time, poor building performance and inadequacies due to these maintenance defects have been known to cause unproductivity of building users and even illnesses. Therefore, it is pertinent to investigate these defects to create maintenance solutions for them. However, even though studies abound on university building maintenance in Nigeria, its issues, and the factors affecting it, there is still the need to explore the common maintenance defects affecting buildings in public universities. Few studies have been conducted on common building maintenance defects; however, these defects have been well-researched in this study. Therefore, this paper illustrates the findings from assessing the common defects in six selected higher education institutions in the country. This study embraced a quantitative approach, and data were gathered from maintenance managers, supervisors, and technicians working in the Works Departments of the selected public institutions. Data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics such as percentile and factor analysis. Findings revealed that the most common defects affecting university buildings are joinery infestation and fittings, substandard finishes and cracks, deterioration and leakages, and rusting and installation issues.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Civil Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

  • Sustainable Human Settlement and Construction Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

  • Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

  • School of Arts, Design and Architecture, Faculty of Arts, Design and Humanities, De Mont University, Leicester, United Kingdom

  • Sections